tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5304534739961122812024-02-21T05:51:02.852+13:00Calling all RUNCIMANsCombined project diary for the <a href="http://runciman.lornahen.com/">Runciman One Name Study</a> and <a href="http://worldfamilies.net/surnames/Runciman">DNA Project</a>. Interested in hearing from all RUNCIMANs (and surname variants).Runcimans All Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05375256261493939473noreply@blogger.comBlogger154125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-91122980071896794822018-04-23T12:22:00.000+12:002018-04-23T12:22:05.877+12:00Time for another Inventive indexing entryMary A REAMAN for Mary A RUNCIMAN
(from the 1922 Michigan death cert. of Mary's daughter Hannah E MILLER nee ALLEN)RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-5829177985119171802017-04-10T22:32:00.002+12:002017-04-10T22:32:52.168+12:00Time estimates for the four matching I1 haplogroup lineagesWe now have time estimates for the new sub branches to our I-Y22033 overall Runciman SNP (this prior post refers).
They come from the new YFull.com tree, version 5.03.
YFull also provide a different name for the Alexander of Meikle Pinkerton SNP branch - I-A11393, compared to FTDNA's I-A11400.
The overall I-Y22033 has moved back 50 years from 550 to 600 ybp (years before present, where RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-44824598816238992052017-02-16T00:03:00.002+13:002017-02-16T00:03:59.315+13:00New I1 branches for RUNCIMANCheck out the abbreviated I1 tree in the Haplogroup section of DNASurnames, particularly the I1 RUNCIMAN branch I-Y22033 aka I-A9096
FTDNA have revised their I1 tree after analysing the 6 RUNCIMAN BigY results and we now have two subclades under I-Y22033,
I-A11399 for Lineage 1a (the Wanton Walls branch) and
I-A11400 for Lineage 1d (Alexander of Meikle Pinkerton's branch)
Waiting for RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-16723966010823547232016-11-23T16:49:00.003+13:002016-11-23T16:49:46.001+13:00There must be....... more Runciman descendants interested in exploring their connections to the known lines.
Is YOUR tree listed on the One Name Study pages?
Is that line already represented in the Runciman (and variants) Surname DNA project?
If not do YOU have a:
direct male line Runciman male willing to take the plunge and see what science can add to our knowledge of the assorted Runciman families by RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-89642770053224174682016-11-14T03:37:00.000+13:002016-11-23T16:27:18.352+13:00Lineage 1 (Haplogroup I1) Y-DNA111 markersThree of the four BigY tested RUNCIMeN from Lineage 1 now have their yDNA STR results from the YFull analysis of their BigY files.
Those on the panel from yDNA67 to yDNA111 have now been extracted for the three so far available and included on the overall result grid on DNASurnames.
YFull.com also give you your closest STR matches, and it is reassuring to see that these three are their closest RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-11115114169329978192016-08-07T12:06:00.000+12:002016-08-07T12:06:28.973+12:00And with a second leap ...Processing of all four of the BigY kits for our Lineage 1 (Haplogroup I1) proceeds through YFull with the terminal SNP remaining at I-Y22033.
Behind the scenes the STR results are gradually being added which will give us the Y-DNA111 markers for all four of our representatives.
With the latest version of the YFull tree we seem to have jumped a further 200 years towards the present, as the TMRCA RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-41715922680429287902016-07-13T02:01:00.002+12:002016-07-13T02:01:22.187+12:00Runcimans can leap centuries at a single bound !aka BigY update.
You may recall that our matching Lineage 1 lines were stuck at a haplogroup of I-Z60*, ie negative for known subgroups, this branch of the yDNA haplogroup of mankind being given as forming 4,700 years ago, with 4,300 years to the most recent common ancestor.
Two of the lines had completed processing at YFull, and a third uploaded but not yet complete.
That's the old news.
RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-28885002239190925992016-06-16T13:50:00.001+12:002016-06-16T13:50:22.850+12:00BigY update/Sale timeTwo of the BigY kits have now completed at least their preliminary placement on the YFull.com tree.
Still both at I-Z60*.
The third, Jim (R-10) 's has only just started processing atYFull.
Our fourth BigY test results are expected next month from FTDNA.
David's has yet to finish the remainder of the processing at YFull, and the YFull tree version recently published only included kits prior to RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-41946299819945910922016-04-24T12:38:00.000+12:002016-04-24T12:38:02.762+12:00BigYThank you to the generous donations after a plea on our RUNCIMAN Group on Facebook, we have now ordered a BigY test for another of the matching I1 haplogroup lines.
That's three of the four now represented.
One, Kevin, for the William of Crail lineage 1b is fully processed and analysed and awaiting more data at YFull.
The second, David, for the Alexander of Meikle Pinkerton lineage 1d has been RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-59624020747509967732016-03-07T13:48:00.000+13:002016-03-08T14:27:35.598+13:00GOONSNo, not Neddie Seagoon et al, for those of you old enough to remember them.
A recent initiative by the Guild of One Name Studies (with whom the RUNCIMAN Surname One Name Study is registered) is to provide web hosting to registered members, and include maintenance of such sites when members can no longer do so.
Although this is only a trial (until Jun 2016), it seemed a good opportunity to turn RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-65899343569892913892016-02-07T13:28:00.000+13:002016-03-08T13:32:32.497+13:00IdentifiedNothing like an update to include a list of unidentified RUNCIMANs from the 1851 census to spur the research.
The following day Ann RUNCIMAN was placed into the family I believe she most likely belongs to, and removed from the list.LornaHenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05199921559356749656noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-49213203382099618022016-02-06T20:39:00.000+13:002016-02-06T20:45:35.960+13:00Lineage site updateDon't get too excited by the changes shown under Recent Changes > Latest Lineage Changes
Most, if not all, are part of a tidyup to ensure WikiTree is the WebLink provided given that's where most of our collaborative RUNCIMAN activity is these days.
Have YOU included your RUNCIMAN data there and connected up your pedigree to any existing trees as appropriate?
The Descendant Charts however LornaHenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05199921559356749656noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-69265892026520351552015-12-18T18:48:00.000+13:002015-12-18T18:48:20.727+13:00Who was Ann WESTMINSTER?A tidy up of the FamilySearch Family Tree for Elizabeth FAMILTON and William RUNCIMAN's family led me to a suggested duplicate as a candidate to merge.
A William RUNCIMAN was indexed as marrying an Ann WESTMINSTER 20 May 1784 St Botolph, Aldersgate, London.
Who were they? Who was she?
The only candidate I had for William in this timeframe/place was married on the same day, same place, to an RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-64366302739969405042015-11-05T22:58:00.000+13:002015-11-06T16:09:57.440+13:00New Y-DNA results on modal for I1 groupCheck out the Summary DNA page for our latest set of Y-DNA results - page down to the pedigree linked table.
Runciman (R-20), another descendant of William of Crail (lineage 1b), has tested to Y-DNA67 and turns out to be an exact match to Jerry, R-2 from lineage 1a.
Updates to other pages will follow in due course.
6th Nov update: Which they now have.
The more detailed DNA project pages onLornaHenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05199921559356749656noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-12168740821987071332015-11-04T14:09:00.003+13:002015-11-04T14:09:41.908+13:00RUNICIONANNot quite another Inventive Indexing entry, as in this case it is actually how the original document has Runciman spelt.
Thanks to Sandra for joining the dots to identify that Netty PAINE daughter of John RUNICIONAN and "unknown", was actually Janet, daughter of John RUNCIMAN and Jean ANDERSON.
(The family emigrated from Berwickshire, sailing on the "Charlotte Harrison" which arrived in NewRuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-4383177434358755442015-10-13T23:04:00.000+13:002015-10-13T23:04:03.314+13:00Yes we're still hereLack of postings doesn't mean a lack of activity.
On the Y-DNA front results are in from another line of "William of Crail", thankfully not showing any blips along the direct male line Y-DNA front.
The DNA project pages have been updated to include results for Alan (R-17).
Interestingly, still no distinct marker that can be used to identify just William of Crail's male descendants.
The recent RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-43694123221052688442014-11-18T13:52:00.001+13:002014-11-18T13:52:02.984+13:00Which reminds meThe recent activity (see prior post) reminds me that there is an updated phylogenetic tree showing how the Lineage 1 (Haplogroup I1) RUNCIMAN families connect via analysis of the Y-DNA67 marker STR results.
Check out the Lineage 1 Analysis page.
Sorry you'll have to page down to interpret the R-nn numbers to their appropriate RUNCIMAN lines I've not made time to provide hotlinks on the RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-20249633747199597222014-11-18T13:22:00.000+13:002014-11-18T13:22:23.639+13:00Updated twigThe descendant charts associated with Alexander & Janet (HENDRIE) RUNCIMAN of Meikle Pinkerton, and therefore also that of Thomas and Jane/Jean (SIMPSON) RUNCIMAN have been updated to include a newly confirmed twig down from the latter's son Thomas who married Mary REDPATH.
Descendant John has joined us in the Facebook RUNCIMAN group.RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-41522283022026025022014-09-17T18:08:00.000+12:002014-09-17T18:08:44.289+12:00Thomas (m. Jane SIMPSON) RUNCIMAN updateThe overall dna grid on the Supplementary DNA pages has been updated to show the full (Y-DNA67) results for the descendant of George & Janet (DARLING) RUNCIMAN.
Looks like we may finally have broken the jinx of the mismatches between the assumed and papertrail descendants of Thomas and Jane (SIMPSON) RUNCIMAN.
The "assumed" parentage status for the link from George to Thomas has been removedRuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-91069076665877224992014-08-19T13:38:00.000+12:002014-08-19T13:38:30.774+12:00And now for GeorgeY-DNA results are beginning to arrive in for the descendant of George & Janet (DARLING) RUNCIMAN who kindly agreed to be a representative for this line.
Early days, but so far we do know that he is a 12/12 match to all bar one of Lineage 1 (11/12 to another of the lines assumed to be down from Thomas and Jane (SIMPSON) RUNCIMAN).
Follow progress at the overall dna result grid.
RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-52634566961962080072014-06-27T23:00:00.001+12:002014-06-27T23:00:27.161+12:00Slowly but surelyAll good things take time.
The Runciman Surname DNA project result set has grown by one.
The conundrum of which families belong to Thomas and Jane (SIMPSON) RUNCIMAN has had some light shone on it with our latest set of results.
We have another Lineage 1 match, which looks to confirm that Thomas and Mary (REDPATH) RUNCIMAN definitely do belong, despite past results.
For now, only the Summary RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-75771803295363983502014-04-30T20:42:00.001+12:002014-04-30T20:42:47.094+12:00Notable or Notorious?
Another candidate has been added to the Notables collection, which also covers the Notorious - which latter category the latest addition belongs to.
Check out the very brief summary of the career of William Woodman RUNCIMAN aka Sir Grenville Louis John TEMPLE.
We'll also add RIMERMAN to the inventive indexing collection.RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-87301488177633530742014-04-27T14:28:00.000+12:002014-04-27T14:28:00.834+12:00Inventive indexing ctdA couple of census entries for a RUNCIEMAN family were rather elusive on both ancestry and findmypast.
1841 indexed as RUNCAROW on findmypast and NUNCOMAN on ancestry
1851 indexed as REMCIEMAN on both sites.
Corrections lodged.RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-39402007136003995102014-03-20T01:20:00.002+13:002014-03-20T01:20:37.689+13:00Don't be fooledThe latest lineage changes listed are mostly because of cosmetic changes rather than any exciting new finds.
Some descendant charts will however have more twigs.RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-530453473996112281.post-66173320647742546212014-02-11T12:28:00.000+13:002014-02-11T12:28:39.348+13:00John Broome RUNCIMAN ++The Lineages section of the Runciman One Name Study has been fully refreshed.
Although the latest changes index doesn't show many updates, the published trees will have new twigs which should now be included in the site search.
The main visible change is the research around the family of John Broome RUNCIMAN, son of George, the army family without a home in the known lineages.
As posted in the RuncimansAll Adminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08928143863713298292noreply@blogger.com0